来自 文史 2018-11-22 15:36 的文章

中美南海航行自由相关法律问题研究(18)


  36 The Report of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, op.cit..
  37 Raul (Pete) Pedrozo, “Preserving Navigational Rights and Freedoms:The Right to Conduct Military Activities in China's Exclusive Economic Zone”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol.9, Issue 1, March 2010, pp.9-29;Zhang Haiwen, “Is It Safeguarding the Freedom of Navigation or Maritime Hegemony of the United States:Comments on Raul (Pete) Pedrozo's Article on Military Activities in the EEZ”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol.9, Issue 1, March 2010, pp.31-47.
  38 Raul (Pete) Pedrozo, “Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone:East Asia Focus”, International Law Studies, Vol.90, 2014, pp.514-543, http://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=ils
  39 Sam Bateman, “Turning Back the Clock on UNCLOS”, August 20, 2015, https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/turning-back-the-clock-on-unclos/
  40 Mark J.Valencia, Kazumine Akimoto, “Guidelines for Navigation and Overflight in the Exclusive Economic Zone”, Marine Policy, Vol.30, Issue 6, November 2006, pp.704-711.
  41 Georges V.Galdorisi and Alan G.Kaufman, “Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone:Preventing Uncertainty and Defusing Conflict”, California Western International Law Journal, Vol.32, Issue 2, 2002, pp.253-301.
  42 “The MOX Plant Case (Request for Provisional Measures) (Ireland v.United Kingdom) ”, (3 December2001) , Juris Net LLC, https://arbitrationlaw.com/sites/default/files/free_pdfs/2001-11-19_-_vre1911.07.pdf, p.3.
  43 International Court of Justice, “Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v.Uruguay) ”, Summary of the Judgment of 20 April 2010, http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/135/15895.pdf, Rep.14, 83, para.204.
  44 Raul (Pete) Pedrozo, “Preserving Navigational Rights and Freedoms:The Right to Conduct Military Activities in China's Exclusive Economic Zone”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol.9, Issue 1, March 2010, pp.9-29.
  45 Permanent Court of International Justice, “The Case of the S.S.Lotus (Fr.v.Turk.) ”, 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser.A) No.10, Sept.7, http://www.worldcourts.com/pcij/eng/decisions/1927.09.07_lotus.htm
  46 James W.Houck, Nicole M.Anderson, “The United States, China, and Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea”, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Vol.13, Issue 3, 2014, pp.441-452.
  47 Raul (Pete) Pedrozo, “Preserving Navigational Rights and Freedoms:The Right to Conduct Military Activities in China's Exclusive Economic Zone”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol.9, Issue 1, March 2010, pp.9-29.
  48 Erik Franckx, “American and Chinese Views on Navigational Rights of Warships”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol.10, Issue 1, March 2011, pp.187-206.